Senate fails to fund DHS for fifth time as Democrats block vote and TSA lines grow

Vanesa Belen,
 March 21, 2026

The Senate couldn't muster even a simple majority on Friday to reopen the Department of Homeland Security, let alone the 60 votes needed to end the standoff. Only 84 senators bothered to show up. Of those, 46 Republicans and one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, voted to fund DHS. Thirty-seven Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, voted no.

That's five failed votes. Thirty-five days without funding. And the lines at America's airports are getting longer.

The Airports Tell the Story

Nearly 10% of TSA agents called out sick nationwide on Thursday. At JFK Airport, the absentee rate hit 28.7%. At LaGuardia, 15.9% of screeners didn't show. Passengers at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport faced lengthy lines as the workforce thins and morale craters, as New York Post reports.

AFGE National President Everett Kelley didn't mince words about what that looks like on the ground:

"A TSO selling plasma to keep the lights on is unconscionable."

Kelley added that tens of thousands of families are turning to food banks while Congress refuses to act. Whether or not you think the union is playing politics with those numbers, the underlying reality is not in dispute: TSA agents are working without pay, and the traveling public is absorbing the consequences.

What Democrats Actually Want

Schumer's position is simple to state and useful to examine. Democrats want to fund TSA, and they want to do it without funding ICE. They've offered standalone legislation to pay screeners while leaving immigration enforcement in limbo. Republicans have blocked those attempts at least six times.

Schumer, speaking at a rally against the SAVE America Act, framed it this way:

"TSA agents could be paid, and airport lines could end right away if Republicans stop holding TSA hostage and vote yes."

The framing is clever. It positions Democrats as the adults rescuing airport workers from Republican obstruction. But the maneuver is transparent. Selectively funding the parts of DHS that generate sympathetic news coverage while starving immigration enforcement isn't a compromise. It's hostage-taking dressed up as humanitarianism.

You don't get to pick which laws get funded based on which ones poll well. DHS is one department. Its mission includes border security, customs enforcement, and yes, the Transportation Security Administration. Democrats are trying to amputate immigration enforcement from the department's budget and then blame Republicans for the bleeding.

Republicans Offered Concessions. Democrats Walked Away.

The White House, through border czar Tom Homan, engaged directly. Talks took place on Thursday night. More discussions were expected on Friday evening. Sen. John Barrasso laid out what was on the table:

"The White House outlined an entire list of bipartisan solutions. They include expanding the use of body cameras for officers and making IDs for officers clearly visible. Democrats have rejected all our good faith offers. They've rejected bipartisan solutions."

Body cameras. Visible ID badges. These are the kinds of reforms that, in any other context, Democrats would sprint toward a microphone to champion. Police accountability measures are their brand. But when those reforms come packaged with a functioning immigration enforcement apparatus, suddenly they aren't interested.

That tells you everything about what this standoff is actually about. It's not about TSA workers selling plasma. It's about ICE.

Schumer's Tell

Schumer couldn't resist showing his hand. In one of his more revealing statements, he claimed:

"The President fired Kristi Noem because he agrees with Democrats — ICE is out of control and a threat to public safety at large."

Set aside the creative interpretation of personnel decisions. Focus on the claim itself: ICE is "a threat to public safety." This is the position of the Senate Democratic caucus. Not that ICE needs reform. Not that specific operations went too far. The agency responsible for enforcing immigration law is itself a danger to the public.

When you believe enforcement is the problem, defunding it isn't a bargaining chip. It's the goal.

The GOP Isn't Unified Either

Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana broke from the pack with a suggestion that Republicans accept the Democrats' offer to fund TSA and other non-ICE agencies, then push ICE funding through budget reconciliation. His frustration was palpable:

"I'm convinced that listening to the same thing over and over and over again is lowering my IQ when we know that nothing is going to resolve this because my Democratic friends politically can't agree to a compromise about ICE."

Kennedy also offered perhaps the sharpest assessment of the Democratic caucus's internal dynamics, calling it a fact that "the Karen wing of the Democratic Party is in ascendency, and it is firmly in control."

Kennedy's reconciliation idea has a certain tactical logic. But it also concedes the framing Democrats want: that immigration enforcement is separable from the rest of homeland security, something to be handled later, through a different process, with different political math. Senate Majority Leader Thune sees the Democratic strategy for what it is.

"My impression, at least up until now, is this is all about politics for Chuck Schumer and the Democrats. The far-left base is demanding, again, that they fight the president."

Thirty-Five Days and Counting

This shutdown is already 35 days old. It could surpass last fall's 43-day closure of the entire federal government. The difference is that this one is surgically targeted. DHS is dark. Everything else hums along. That precision is the point. Democrats have isolated the one department whose core mission includes removing illegal immigrants from the country, and they've decided it doesn't deserve to operate.

Meanwhile, Everett Kelley issued a parting shot at every member of Congress who's walked through airport security on their way home for the weekend:

"Members of Congress have walked past our TSA members at airport security checkpoints more often than they've met to negotiate an end to this stalemate."

He's right about that much. The workers caught in the middle deserve better. But the solution isn't to fund half a department so Democrats can gut immigration enforcement without a vote. The solution is to fund all of DHS and let every agency within it do its job.

Thirty-seven senators looked at that option on Friday and said no. One Democrat, exactly one, crossed the aisle. The rest followed Schumer into a fifth failed vote, content to let TSA agents go unpaid for as long as it takes to shield illegal immigrants from the law.

That's not a funding dispute. It's a priority list.

About Vanesa Belen

Join the Patriot Movement:

Where you get your news matters. Make sure to sign up for the Patriot Post Daily Digest.